Great effort.
I've taken a look at the most recent version of the Celebrated Burgeon Ornaments TG font. I think it’s a great effort, and the choice of assigning the glyphs to the plain ASCII codes is a reasonable one. The TTF format has a special way of encoding symbol fonts but I think it’s not a very reliable mechanism and is confusing to users. Also, the Symbol font encoding is not supported by OTF, so it’s very difficult to release a font with compatible encoding in both OTF and TTF.
I also definitely support the idea of releasing the font under the SIL Open Font License.
For the opensource Lato font which I helped my friend Łukasz Dziedzic release, we’ve done the following:
In FontLab Studio’s Copyright information section, in the "Copyright" field, we’ve entered:
"Copyright (c) 2010-2011 by tyPoland Lukasz Dziedzic with Reserved Font Name "Lato". Licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1."
In the "Notice/Description" field, we’ve entered:
"Lato is a sanserif typeface family designed in the Summer 2010 by Warsaw-based designer Lukasz Dziedzic ("Lato" means "Summer" in Polish). It tries to carefully balance some potentially conflicting priorities: it should seem quite "transparent" when used in body text but would display some original traits when used in larger sizes. The classical proportions, particularly visible in the uppercase, give the letterforms familiar harmony and elegance. At the same time, its sleek sanserif look makes evident the fact that Lato was designed in 2010, even though it does not follow any current trend. The semi-rounded details of the letters give Lato a feeling of warmth, while the strong structure provides stability and seriousness."
In the License information section, in the "License" field, we’ve entered:
"Copyright (c) 2010-2011 by tyPoland Lukasz Dziedzic (http://www.typoland.com/) with Reserved Font Name "Lato". Licensed under the SIL Open Font License, Version 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)."
In the License URL field, we've entered:
"http://scripts.sil.org/OFL"
So my recommendation would be to write some short story in the Notice/Description field, and format the Copyright and License fields with the addition: with Reserved Font Name "Celebrated Burgeon Ornaments TG". This is a good hint to other font developers that if they wanted to extend the font, they'd need to change the name (as per terms of the OFL).
Best regards,
Adam
Bookmarks