First, you have done a very good job!
The only reason I posted is to make you aware of two things that shout 'illustration' to an engineer's eyeballs.
The first item is that the refraction through the glass of the canopy would distort the image behind the canopy, and would also make it so the 'ground' shown in the glass of the canopy would not be the ground immediately behind the canopy.
(Recall that the image on two sides of a fishtank are not matched, and a fish may be fully visible to you in both of the panes of glass, even though the panes are at 90 degrees with respect to each other. - Same principle.)
To more fully simulate this, you might use a copy of the background, and apply a clipview of the entire canopy to that background, using an area below the canopy to align with the top edge of the canopy. Shrink it in the y dimension to skew it, and place it behind the canopy, but in front of the background. (Or apply a bitmap copy of the background to a shape the outline of the canopy, and recenter that background and resize it appropriately.)
I hope that made sense.
Other than that, and that fact that at those speeds, using standard photographic techniques, the 'clouds' would be fairly straight tubes from edge to edge of the picture, and not lumpy, due to their relative speed, it is an excellent illustration. Even as it is, it works very well, and you have every right to be proud of it.
David
Bookmarks