Eleven years ago... ...https://www.talkgraphics.com/showthr...JPF)-be-common.
So if JPWG2000 was on the scene in Year 2000, it could be said it has had a slow uptake:
https://xkcd.com/2254/
Acorn
Eleven years ago... ...https://www.talkgraphics.com/showthr...JPF)-be-common.
So if JPWG2000 was on the scene in Year 2000, it could be said it has had a slow uptake:
https://xkcd.com/2254/
Acorn
Acorn - installed Xara software: Cloud+/Pro+ and most others back through time (to CC's Artworks). Contact for technical remediation/consultancy for your web designs.
When we provide assistance, your responses are valuable as they benefit the community. TG Nuggets you might like. Report faults: Xara Cloud+/Pro+/Magix Legacy; Xara KB & Chat
I know it's been quite a long time, just wondering if anyone has stayed up on where it's headed, if anywhere.
I've been playing with them lately as they seem like they should be the obvious choice, given that they can resolve many more shades of color, fewer artifacts, and in my experimentation, smaller in file size. However, the format isn't universally supported so that is the major drawback.
I tried to upload a jpg2000 image file into this message and it was rejected as an unsupported file type.
Sheesh !
AndFarr,
Thank you for your info. Very enlightening.
Jim
even svg took its time....
-------------------------------
Nothing lasts forever...
Kind of sad, it even supported transparency.
Marc
________________________________
Illustrations
Could not agree more.
The JPG 2000 was never intended to replace the ubiquitous JPG format and the standard has not been updated for 7 years.
For transparency support there is the PNG file format which, IMHO, is better than the lossy JPeg2000 and is equal to the the lossless JPeg2000.
Bookmarks