sorry Frank, but you are being silly - I don't believe for a moment you do not understand what is being said
what matters is that you get what you want and you get it at a fair price - there are many who need what illustrator has, and the price for that is reasonable; if you don't need it well, its not even an issue, is it
Last edited by handrawn; 17 February 2012 at 09:20 PM. Reason: punctus
-------------------------------
Nothing lasts forever...
no, what is silly is not talking about value for money
Adobe Illustrator CS5 €860,00 convert
Adobe Photoshop CS5 €969,90 convert
Adobe CS5.5 Design Standard €1 895,24 convert
links from amazon.fr
no wonder 99% of people who use it have a pirate copy
i paid a grand for my copy of cs1 and regretted it ever since not because its crap software but because its hugely overpriced and in the end i found workarounds for everything using non-adobe prods
and yes i compare products in the supermarket not because im poor but because i dont like being ripped off and this is no different
If someone tried to make me dig my own grave I would say No.
They're going to kill me anyway and I'd love to die the way I lived:
Avoiding Manual Labour.
Even "ripped off" is a value judgment for the individual to make. You obviously have made that judgment as regards your purchase. Others perhaps make a different value judgment. Neither is the right nor the wrong judgment in this case.
I do some testing for some very reasonably priced software. One title can be purchased for about $50 legally. There are known to be tens of thousands of illegitimate copies floating around world wide. Ripping off a company--because that is what it is--is not done by people with a modicum of ethics. And the flip side is that people who desire to steal will do so regardless of the cost of the software.
Take care, Mike
hyperbole
I can quite happily accept it is not for you Frank and you are entitled to think it is crap - but that does not mean it is crap and it does not make it bad value for money in it's target markets which are corporate
just like the vector editor that I happen to know you do use, illustrator comes with a 30day trial period, long enough to check it out in comparision with said other editor which I know you have had for a long time
eyebrows are always raised elsewhere when people say they buy product without taking full advantage of trial period..but I've done it myself and it is annoying true
the reason I said you were being silly is this - in a computer warehouse [hypermarket] I have a whole load of choice - just recently I needed a new color printer and I could have spent anything from 200 GBP to 2000 GBP or more - the higher end machines do all sorts of things I simply don't need, and they are sometimes rather complicated to setup and or use ... this does not make them crap, and it does not make them a rip off, just because I can print perfectly well from a much lower end machine - it just means they are oriented to a different set of requirements and environments
Last edited by handrawn; 18 February 2012 at 10:47 AM. Reason: typo
-------------------------------
Nothing lasts forever...
you are basing your reply on the premise that highly priced products are inherently better than lower priced products
that is simply not true, it is, in fact, silly
If someone tried to make me dig my own grave I would say No.
They're going to kill me anyway and I'd love to die the way I lived:
Avoiding Manual Labour.
its not a premise Frank - its a specific case [illustrator] and an analogy [colour printers]
of course it is not true that all expensive stuff is better, but by exactly the same token not all inexpensive stuff is better either - depends a lot on what you need
it doesn't do to confuse value for money with suitability for purpose
in this case illustrator was not suitable for you, and a 'bad purchase' in your specific case
but crap it is not
@ BOB I really like that illustratoin too Bob, well done [I wish I had more time to explore illustrator, particularlly the brushes, which are far better than xara's but hey life is getting shorter by the day....]
-------------------------------
Nothing lasts forever...
a can of beans at 34p is suitable for the purpose, at £3.34 it's still fit for the purpose but hugely overpriced
If someone tried to make me dig my own grave I would say No.
They're going to kill me anyway and I'd love to die the way I lived:
Avoiding Manual Labour.
I have CS5.5 Web Design Premium . I don't use half of it. One program I use heavily, others a lot some hardly at all.
The program I use heavily has no equivalent, the others do.
I don't religiously upgrade the Adobe software. I started with one program and then I really need two and so inevitably one you use two Adobe products one of the suites becomes more cost effective.
My upgrade path has rarely been because of killer features, it has been because of my clients. My clients often use Adobe software. They give me assets created in Adobe software and expect back assets for use in Adobe software. When one of my clients engaged me on a project for $7,000 and they bought CS5 I was forced to upgrade from CS3 to CS5. The CS5.5 release included mobile development features and that was a required upgrade on my part.
For me, the value for money aspect of the software is less relevant. The cost of using Adobe software is, for me, the cost of doing business with many of my clients.
If a client was using product X and I was going to work with them and the money was right, I would buy product X.
I mention this because generally the circles in which Adobe software legitimately moves, isn't buying it purely on a feature basis, or value for money basis - Adobe software has become the common language of interchange between companies involved in Media. Besides being the common language of asset interchange, it is also the common language of skillsets amongst people - there's an expectation that you know how to use Adobe software.
If I was an Artist/Graphic designer working on commissions to produce pure artwork rather than work in a pipeline, then I would be interested in price and probably giving non-Adobe products serious consideration. We all know that for artwork Xara is capable of anything illustrator can do - when the right artist is using it.
At one time I used Xara Xtreme heavily and indeed made good use of XWD for projects where the Adobe pipeline came into play. Lately that isn't the case.
you know I get a serious attack of the raised eyebrows heavenwards whenever anyone says anything like that - what [I hope] you mean is that the vector drawing tools in xara will do everything the vector drawing tools in illustrator will do .... but it doesn't stop there, there are lots of other issues eg color space to name but one ...
anyhow I've probably said enough
-------------------------------
Nothing lasts forever...
Bookmarks