I don't think it's a bug or a file corruption but just plain old common sense.
If you have 3 layers (or frames in this case) and the top layer has a red square, the 2nd layer has a blue square in the exact same position and the 3rd layer has a green square in the exact same position, then what would you expect a "view all" button to display?. A red square? A blue square? A green square? A combination of all three? (Whatever that would be!). Surely the answer would be a red square as that is on top of all the other squares.
I attach a sample xar file. There are 4 frames. Each frame has a numbered orange square and the same numbered blue square, but the blue square is offset whilst the orange square is in the exact same position.
Click on an individual frame and you will see the orange and blue squares and the corresponding numbers.
Click on view all and you see the four blue squares + numbers (because of the offset) but only one orange square + the number four (because of the overlay) .
Wind the view quality to WireFrame and you see the squares and numbers below the orange squares.
What else are you expecting to see when selecting "view all"?
Last edited by Egg Bramhill; 20 March 2007 at 11:48 PM.
Bookmarks