Yet removing it fixed the problem - so there was clearly some influence yes?
I don't recall another instance of this being reported, so the risk is low.
As asked before, could there also be a link with having the favicon <head> placeholder set as a 'repeating object' across multiple (different sized) pages (rather than just manually duplicated)?
Until it's fixed - nope.
After it's fixed, having got used to the work-around, the fix may be redundant
Bookmarks