Welcome to TalkGraphics.com
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: windows xp

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Runcorn England
    Posts
    676

    Default

    3 weeks and solid as a rock...no freezes

    can this be real?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Runcorn England
    Posts
    676

    Default

    3 weeks and solid as a rock...no freezes

    can this be real?

  3. #3

    Default

    Well, I can't say I've ever had that much trouble with WindowsXP, at least until I installed a new 256 MB SD-RAM stick. Then everything seemed to just get slower O..o

    Ahh well, I'm back to 2000, which is pretty much like a rock now... Maybe if 2000 crashes severely, I'll give XP another try, but for now, I'm quite happy.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    422

    Default

    I wonder how long this thread is going to be [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    875

    Default

    windows xp appears to be much better as far as stability goes (compared to what I was using ... win98)

    Just an idea about the Ram , I read if they are different brands or are numbered as different speed ( 100 or 133) then they might cause problems ...but who knows

    David K ... www.dkingdesign.com http://www.dkingdesign.com/stuff/signature.jpg

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Runcorn England
    Posts
    676

    Default

    forgot to add...when i put in a dodgy cd it [the os] still turns into a 386 with 640k of ram.
    otherwise surprisingly stable

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Leigh, Lancashire, UK
    Posts
    436

    Default

    My record up-time on Xp is now 2 weeks and 4 days, compared to a max of about 2 on 98.

    There is no performance degradation, no crashes, and the only reason I rebooted after 2 weeks and 4 days was because of a hardware installation.

    Very stable OS in my experience, as was Win2k. The 9x line is bad, too much DOS in it [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif[/img]



    Michael Ward
    http://www.metalandplastics.co.uk
    http://www.leighcenturions.net

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    andalucía · españa and lower saxony · germany
    Posts
    2,125

    Default

    Girls & guys,

    pls drop me a line as soon as XP professional
    01. is as fast as Windows 2000 Professional
    02. is still up and running without any crash after 14 months - this is my benchmark with the 4 systems on our LAN over here.

    jens

    jens g.r. benthien
    designer
    http://www.sacalobra.de

    ----------//--
    If you don't know how to dream you'll never be a designer.
    ----------//--
    --------------------//--
    We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.
    --------------------//--

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    317

    Default

    OT somewhat but still amusing


    Techweb news item:
    The University of North Carolina has finally found a network server that, although missing for four years, hasn't missed a packet in all that time. Try as they might, university administrators couldn't find the server. Working with Novell Inc. (stock: NOVL), IT workers tracked it down by meticulously following cable until they literally ran into a wall. The server had been mistakenly sealed behind drywall by maintenance workers.

    Ich bin ein New Yorker
    "If you can do good, you should."
    W.K. Clark

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    422

    Default

    and that took them 4 years to find it? wooow

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •