Originally Posted by
ggsmit
thanks for coming back on this @pauland . i do plead guilty on some of the 'charges' and realize that you would not have scoured the page source otherwise you would have stumbled across the google code. the practice is on gmaps and it was one of the pages i left out in order to make it more 'mobile friendly' - thanks for reminding me to put it back :-)
the site you stumbled across is indeed very well designed, your own site even more so [and cudos for the sally martin site!]. i was not paid for doing the site, neither is web design even on the level of hobby with me - as can be clearly seen.... the 'customer' gets plenty of 'leads' from inter alia the internet presence although 'word of mouth' is a far better marketing tool in the predominantly rural area of the practice.
back to w3c though - as i said, i was just wondering, and still am ...
kind regards
g
Bookmarks