Glass balls, and now ZOOM! Something different... On this one I was playing with perspective and named colors. I tried to do some depth of field, but I'm not to happy with that one. Any suggestions? I hope you like it.
Paul
Glass balls, and now ZOOM! Something different... On this one I was playing with perspective and named colors. I tried to do some depth of field, but I'm not to happy with that one. Any suggestions? I hope you like it.
Paul
I like it Paul. No suggestions from me. Surprise, surprise.
Larry a.k.a wizard509
Never give up. You will never fail, but you may find a lot of ways that don't work.
I prefer the version where all objects are in sharp focus. It just feels better even though I can see the logic of items farther away having less focus.
Gary W. Priester
Mr. Moderator Emeritus Dude, Sir
gwpriester.com | eyetricks-3d-stereograms.com | eyeTricks on Facebook | eyeTricks on YouTube | eyeTricks on Instagram
I'm with Gary. I much prefer the sharp one. Our eyes don't see with a depth of field. Yes, I know, someones going to tell me I'm wrong there. Okay then, I don't perceive a depth of field.
Keith
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There are 10 types of people in this world .... Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Hi, Paul.
Your work is perfect (as usually )
I prefer no-zoom variant
Igor
Beautiful rendering!
I guess it depends on what you're trying to achieve as to which is preferable. The blur example, to me, is a bit extreme. Perhaps some adjustment there might make a difference.
R_o_n _a_l _d __C. __D_u_k_e
x a r a . c o m..a r t i s t s ..g a l l e r y
Xara's Facebook
Xara Designer Pro X 16, Xara 3D7 Web Designer
Well I agree with the majority. I too think the sharp focus looks the best. This one even passed the Wizard test. How about that? These are a lot of fun. Thank you everyone for your comments and participation. I will see what kind of trouble that I can into next.
Thanks again for all of your input. I greatly appreciate it.
Paul
Very very cool design
Bookmarks