Triangulation - A stereogram

[handrawn]

that sort of twisting of perspective by perception in the real world is well known Steve - stage illusionists use it for a start

but as its not a solid unbroken object, Gary is right IMO - oh and a master of stereograms - nice one Gary

[steve.ledger]

Oh really? Gee thanks for the heads up

Back on topic, I couldn't get this one because I can only see cross-eyed wise

[angelize]

I think the stereogram is great! I agree with handrawn that because it's not a solid unbroken object that it doesn't count. But it was a great illusion!

[steve.ledger]

Illusion is the whole point. I think Escher understood this and I'm pretty well convinced by now that so does Gary.

[angelize]

I started being able to see stereograms without going cross eyed because of a reflection on my screen. Try to postion your screen if possible so that there is a reflection perhaps from a nearby window. Then try to focus on the reflection while also looking at the stereogram. Once you have been able to see them once or twice it will become easier to see them.

[steve.ledger]

I have non-reflective (by choice) S-IPS panels.
I'm happy to at least see the cross-eye way, else I'd be missing out on Gary's fine efforts - he's quite good at it

[gwpriester]

Here's a cross eyed version so Steve L can see it too.

[steve.ledger]

[HayTay]

You continue to impress me Gary. That is one nice looking 'mistake'.

[Jimi King]

I can see both versions. However in the first one the triangle seems kind of inverted and in the second one the triangle seems to be a background object viewed through a hole in the foreground. I guess this makes me weird.