...and here is the more artistic version with four objects.
...and here is the more artistic version with four objects.
Last edited by gnurf; 27 July 2006 at 01:28 PM.
Paul the Gnurfmeister!
Home: http://www.gnurf.net/v3/ | My stuff for sale: http://www.zazzle.com/gnurf* | Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/pasoderholm
One more version with a background. And I could have made the shadows fit in a bit better but that is no biggie. You can fix that yourselves with the previously posted xar-file.
Last edited by gnurf; 27 July 2006 at 01:11 PM.
Paul the Gnurfmeister!
Home: http://www.gnurf.net/v3/ | My stuff for sale: http://www.zazzle.com/gnurf* | Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/pasoderholm
Paul, that's a great solution. I would say, there are only 3 objects, because the bevel tool add's the 3 additional objects and if you create the rings like in your first post, there are only 3 objects and I think, this is the solution with the fewest rings so far.
But.... unfortunately it is not exact the same as in my reference picture. So, perhaps there are more rings necessary, in order to achive the goal...??
Xhris' solution with none shape break the rules, as he says.
Remi
Last edited by remi; 27 July 2006 at 02:55 PM.
Oh crap! You're right! Well, here's another try, and this time it's five objects of which two are duplicates.
Paul the Gnurfmeister!
Home: http://www.gnurf.net/v3/ | My stuff for sale: http://www.zazzle.com/gnurf* | Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/pasoderholm
Five rings is the best solution, so far...
All the rules you specify are met. To generate the bitmap I broke rules, but the use of the bitmap in the actual submitted solution breaks none of your rules.Originally Posted by remi
Last edited by Xhris; 27 July 2006 at 08:02 PM.
Ok, Xhris. How is it, if I spend you a beer within the next days?Originally Posted by Xhris
I'd prefer a cheque...Originally Posted by remi
This is my way. There are 3 shapes.
Ooops. I`m so sad but I didn`t see Paul`s solution and so I am too late. Sorry.
Last edited by RUSS-USSR; 28 July 2006 at 02:05 AM.
Russ - your solution is very correct (and very same as mine) but you fail where I failed too: the overlapping is incorrect when you compare to Remi's model.
Anyway, here's my last try: TWO objects. But I guess this will be classified as a cheat as I used two bitmaps. But to my defense I have to say that I used only the original three rings and I did not use cut or slice or anything that was not allowed. The only things I did was making two bitmap copies of the rings (which were untouched) and applied transparency.
Paul the Gnurfmeister!
Home: http://www.gnurf.net/v3/ | My stuff for sale: http://www.zazzle.com/gnurf* | Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/pasoderholm
Bookmarks