...and here is the more artistic version with four objects.
...and here is the more artistic version with four objects.
Last edited by gnurf; 27 July 2006 at 01:28 PM.
Paul the Gnurfmeister!
Home: http://www.gnurf.net/v3/ | My stuff for sale: http://www.zazzle.com/gnurf* | Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/pasoderholm
One more version with a background. And I could have made the shadows fit in a bit better but that is no biggie. You can fix that yourselves with the previously posted xar-file.
Last edited by gnurf; 27 July 2006 at 01:11 PM.
Paul the Gnurfmeister!
Home: http://www.gnurf.net/v3/ | My stuff for sale: http://www.zazzle.com/gnurf* | Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/pasoderholm
Paul, that's a great solution. I would say, there are only 3 objects, because the bevel tool add's the 3 additional objects and if you create the rings like in your first post, there are only 3 objects and I think, this is the solution with the fewest rings so far.![]()
But.... unfortunately it is not exact the same as in my reference picture. So, perhaps there are more rings necessary, in order to achive the goal...??![]()
Xhris' solution with none shape break the rules, as he says.![]()
Remi
Last edited by remi; 27 July 2006 at 02:55 PM.
Oh crap! You're right! Well, here's another try, and this time it's five objects of which two are duplicates.
Paul the Gnurfmeister!
Home: http://www.gnurf.net/v3/ | My stuff for sale: http://www.zazzle.com/gnurf* | Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/pasoderholm
Five rings is the best solution, so far...
![]()
All the rules you specify are met. To generate the bitmap I broke rules, but the use of the bitmap in the actual submitted solution breaks none of your rules.Originally Posted by remi
![]()
Last edited by Xhris; 27 July 2006 at 08:02 PM.
Ok, Xhris.Originally Posted by Xhris
How is it, if I spend you a beer within the next days?
![]()
I'd prefer a cheque...Originally Posted by remi
![]()
This is my way. There are 3 shapes.
Ooops. I`m so sad but I didn`t see Paul`s solution and so I am too late. Sorry.
Last edited by RUSS-USSR; 28 July 2006 at 02:05 AM.
Russ - your solution is very correct (and very same as mine) but you fail where I failed too: the overlapping is incorrect when you compare to Remi's model.
Anyway, here's my last try: TWO objects. But I guess this will be classified as a cheat as I used two bitmaps. But to my defense I have to say that I used only the original three rings and I did not use cut or slice or anything that was not allowed. The only things I did was making two bitmap copies of the rings (which were untouched) and applied transparency.
Paul the Gnurfmeister!
Home: http://www.gnurf.net/v3/ | My stuff for sale: http://www.zazzle.com/gnurf* | Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/pasoderholm
Bookmarks