Welcome to TalkGraphics.com
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Berkshire, England
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Corel own and developed 'Xara X' into the parallel Graphics software to 'CorelDraw' ..... right? 'CorelDraw' is supposed to be the Big Daddy but everyone here say 'Xara X' is so much easier to use and produces the same results. Viewing Gallery, backs up this theory as well as high recommendations from likes or Gary and Richard. I agree whole heartedly. So, what I don't understand is, 'why have two packages side-by-side producing the same results ?????' If 'Xara X' is so much cheaper, what does 'CorelDraw' still have over 'Xara X'?????

    Could the bottom line be, that Corel just want money from two package sources ?

    Ashley S H http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif

    **Purple is Bliss and Bliss is Hawaii**

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    RWC, CA, USA
    Posts
    4,472

    Default

    Can ya go in there and change Girl to Boy please.

    Ashely, in case you see this, I'm very sorry. I just assumed. Sigh...........never assume!! http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif

    Richard http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

    ---Wolff On The Prowl---

    http://www.ramwolffsworld.com/
    Richard

    ---Wolff On The Prowl---

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    RWC, CA, USA
    Posts
    4,472

    Default

    XaraX is the clear winner by comparison to CorelDraw. While I like Corel I think it was a pretty dirty deal what they did to Xara a while back and the Karma is perfectly seen. XaraX is great software for the buck. I have been playing with other 'competitors' and while they are comparative in price they do not match the speed and productivity of Xara, nor the creativeness that can be achieved with this program. I am hoping that the next version will rock the socks off of everyone and I'm sure it will!! http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/smile.gif

    Go get a copy girl, you won't regret it!! http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif

    Richard http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

    ---Wolff On The Prowl---

    http://www.ramwolffsworld.com/
    Richard

    ---Wolff On The Prowl---

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Placitas, New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    41,504

    Default

    in a newsletter on the Unleashed.com site, Corel is up for sale and their future is uncertain pending upon who purchases the company.

    Gary

    Gary Priester

    Moderator Person


    <a href="http://www.gwpriester.com">
    www.gwpriester.com </a>


    <a href="http://www.xaraxone.com">
    The Xara Xone </a>




  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Surrey, BC, Canada
    Posts
    2,379

    Default

    Corel didn't develope XaraX they were the disributers for Xara a few years back. then Xara got the distribution back and produces XaraX.
    corel and Xara are two different companies Corel is Canadian..Xara is in England.
    corelDraw suite is bundled suite of software than can produce flyers and page layout up to 999 pages and comes with CorelPaint a bitmap editing sofware.
    Jim
    Intel i7-2600 processor 3.4GH, Windows 10 64Bit, 12GB Memory, Geforce 960 2Gb graphics card

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Berkshire, England
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Corel own and developed 'Xara X' into the parallel Graphics software to 'CorelDraw' ..... right? 'CorelDraw' is supposed to be the Big Daddy but everyone here say 'Xara X' is so much easier to use and produces the same results. Viewing Gallery, backs up this theory as well as high recommendations from likes or Gary and Richard. I agree whole heartedly. So, what I don't understand is, 'why have two packages side-by-side producing the same results ?????' If 'Xara X' is so much cheaper, what does 'CorelDraw' still have over 'Xara X'?????

    Could the bottom line be, that Corel just want money from two package sources ?

    Ashley S H http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif

    **Purple is Bliss and Bliss is Hawaii**

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Posts
    78

    Default

    Richard said:
    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Corel is worth keeping afloat. It gives Microsoft a bit of run for it's money<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Interesting choice of words! Microsoft just sold their shares in Corel for $12.9 million. They brought the shares three years ago for $135 million!

    Jonathan

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    RWC, CA, USA
    Posts
    4,472

    Default

    Dude!! http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif

    Hey Jonathan, well if Vector is buying all of the shares up and there are willing sellers then it's better for them. I think Corel needs to be pulled back and retooled and I think all the folks that hold shares giving them up is a good idea. Microsoft owning shares in Corel never set well with me anyway, so GOOD!! http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/smile.gif

    Richard http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/wink.gif

    ---Wolff On The Prowl---

    http://www.ramwolffsworld.com/
    Richard

    ---Wolff On The Prowl---

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Leigh, Lancashire, UK
    Posts
    436

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV, USA
    Posts
    1,190

    Default

    Painter is still a good product.

    Sheffield Abella
    sheff@sheff.com
    www.sheff.com
    Sheff
    My Site

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •