Upgrade Xara pro19?

[shiphen]

> v20 --- £120/y (discount [60MAGIXV20])& behind by about two years.

That's outrageous. Xara are clearly trying to phase out perpetual licences if the are deliberately making the perpetual licenses 2 years out-of-date. :[

I have told Xara that being a self-employed user with unpredictable workload, I shall never EVER buy a subscription to any piece of software.

i.e. My view is that each and every time that they want more money from me, they will have to earn it with some new work that is of value.

They have been telling me that V20 "is a significant upgrade from v19." but if it is deliberately being kept behind by "about 2 years" that is not acceptable.


Decision: OK, I'll tell Xara that if & when they bring V20 up-to-date with the features in Pro+, then I would be delighted to pay the £120.

J

[handrawn]

no one says you have to buy it

I did, but that was my decision, for me it was worth it

if you have read my post #3 in this thread you will see that I consider [having read the release notes such as they are] that it is currently about March23

I presume what xara mean is that it will be about March25 before they offer another perpetual version, ie two years out, but that is a presumption

[handrawn]

Decision: OK, I'll tell Xara that if & when they bring V20 up-to-date with the features in Pro+, then I would be delighted to pay the £120.

but that cannot be

if the peretual and the pro+ are always at the same point, what is the point of having both; you either pay subscription for 'cutting-edge' or you don't, xara is by no means the only program where this is the case

emptoris arbitrium

[shiphen]

but that cannot be

if the peretual and the pro+ are always at the same point, what is the point of having both; you either pay subscription for 'cutting-edge' or you don't, xara is by no means the only program where this is the case

emptoris arbitrium

Correct. There is indeed no point in buying two version of the same thing at the same time.
What we are discussing here is financing.

J

[handrawn]

it is for xara to decide the price point at which they wish to sell a product, and for us to decide whether to pay it - some will, some won't; if not enough do then xara may change tack by either reducing the price or dropping the product; this is market forces

if you think the price too much for you, for what you are offered, that is your right and your budgeting

[Chris M]

if you think the price too much for you, for what you are offered, that is your right and your budgeting

if you think the price too much for the product, for what you are offered, that is...

Fixed it for you. We all know the product, none know shiphen's situation.

[handrawn]

if you think the price too much for the product, for what you are offered, that is...

sorry chris, I'm not sure what distinction you are making here; the product is implicit in what I said, although if it is not clear then i apologise...

now here is the long answer:

in the context of this thread xara are not helping themselves by saying perpetual20 is behind pro+ - I can see why they do it because they wish to major on the subscription model, but really a more constructive way of looking at it here is that the pro+ version is ahead of perpetual20 and to be ahead you need to pay subscription; they have said as much elsewhere

with that in mind, the perpetual20 version is still ahead of magix version 19 in features and you get xara support instead of magix, you can forget about magix altogether - so perpetual20 can be considered as an upgrade to version 19 in the way it used to be before magix; ok - it may not be annual, and it may be at a higher offer/loyalty/call-it what-you-like for existing customers price, but everything is going up; I have no means of determining if it is a fair price [however that may be defined] and compared to, say affinity, it is more costly sure, but this is the way xara's business model is

120 + VAT is 144 GBP a year, is 12 GBP a month, is around 2.75 GBP a week which is, as another member here has already pointed out in regard to pro+, less than a cup of coffee at costa/starbucks/et-al; even where i live, let alone in the city

no I don't know shiphens's situation and I have [I hope] carefully avoided comment on what that might be, which is not my place; what I was taking issue with is conflating the feature set of perpetual with the the feature set of pro+ at a given point in time - shiphen clarified that point and then said it is the price [finance] he has issue with; I replied that it is as it is; xara may take his opinion on board, or they may not, again that should be implicit; and so that is as far as it goes...?

[shiphen]

Yes, the subscription model may suit regular users, and the accountants of software developers love it (!), but as I have explained it does not suit irregular users.

In truth the subscription model is a great rip-off to many people who either forget that they have subscribed (it always adds up to more than you think) or people who it turns out may not use the product for many months.


Yes, coffee is arguably grossly over-priced too. e.g. Since your raise it, if I had a Starbucks Latte every day for a year it would cost £1,226.40 (from £3.36 x365)


But forget money, within this context I value my own time more than I value my money. And over the years, I have invested a lot of my own time learning Xara Designer and I don't particularly want to learn another system just because of the idiots who run software developers.

e.g. I tried Affinity Designer but found the UI almost unusable.
e.g. A lot of professional designers seem to use Adobe Illustrator. Looking over the shoulder of my designer I thought that it looks quite impressive, (at least lines terminate at the point of the arrows heads! ;^P )... however suffers from the "Licensing virus" and can only be rented... for about GBP 260/year last time I looked.


Xara has been a wonderful product but over the years, their senior managers have made a LOT of poor decisions. (e.g. Anyone remember the dreadful deal they did with Corel - who had vastly inferior product called CorelDraw... but who took Xara off at the knee-caps by [deliberately?] failing to promote it... )

Either way as a matter of principle, I shall never rent software, personally I choose to only ever pay a fixed amount of money for the work that has gone into a product.

Yes, I don't HAVE to buy Xara. I have been a Xara user since Xara Studio - about 1996 - and I have been telling anyone who will listen how good it is for many years.

However despite my broad loyalty, Xara have mostly failed to return the compliment and in my opinion have their upgrades have been GROSSLY overpriced compared to the value that I get out of them. For this reason I have skipped most of the upgrades.


XARA FEEDBACK

Meanwhile back to Xara v20, the Xara operative Matt says the following:

"... Xara v20 software license has most of the features in the Plus v23 product except for some recent releases and Modular Websites / Blocks."

"Thus Xara v20 is 'broadly' up to date with many of the Plus releases in 2023."

And he feel that the idea that v20 is "a couple of years" behind Xara Designer Plus is "completely inaccurate".


IS v20 WORTH IT?
It sounds like the jury is out. So I shall wait until I have a more pressing need for Xara before I upgrade.


J


PS Fwiw, one of the main things I like to use Xara for is editing PDFs. I also like using Xara for simple 2D engineering visualisations. This is mainly because I am used to it... and because I like the way that rotations, transparency, anti-aliasing work. (Weaknesses: Arrowheads on lines have always worked 'incorrectly'. Circular radiuses are almost impossible to draw... but Xara have never seemed interested in fixing either problem.)