Amazing 3D Magiceye

[Rik]

This is THE MOST AMAZING 3D Magiceye image I have ever seen.

Is this one of yours, Gary?

The thing just pops out of the screen.
Moves back and forth, left and right, as you do.

Took me quite a while to see it, though.

EDIT: I have to say now that the image is not as amazing as I first thought. I had accidentally found the second method of viewing 3D images. That's what made me think it was amazing!

[wizard509]

L finally saw something but don't knosw what it is. Is it a snowflake?

[gwpriester]

Larry - It's a 4-leaf clover. That's great that you could see something.

[Rik]

I was having great difficulty seeing the image.

So, what I tried was to hold up a finger half way between me and the image.
I focussed on the finger and soon the image came into view.
What I then saw was a square pop right out of the screen and the four leaves and the stem, cut into the square.

That is very different to what I see if I try and view the image in my normal way.

I don't know if any of that makes sense to anyone else; I thought I would say what I tried.

[wizard509]

I'll give that a try Rik.
.

[gwpriester]

You might have better luck with this image Larry.

[wizard509]

You might have better luck with this image Larry.

Not really, is it a sporal.

[Rik]

Quite easy to see that one, Gary.
And I can definitely do it in two different ways.

So, because the original I posted was difficult to do for me, I tried a different method.
And I can use that different method with your as well, Gary.
Yours then becomes as amazing as any other.
I will now be trying both methods now!

[gwpriester]

Rik - By both methods do you mean Parallel (the star comes forward) and Cross Eyes, the star is indented?

What I have discovered with our eyeTricks Facebook page and two other pages we post our images on is there is very little appreciation for the artistic and craft quality of the images. Often the images that receive the most likes are very simple and often very low quality images but with a very easy to see hidden object. Many people just see stereograms as a puzzle to solve. But they could care less about crisp well defined images. Or layers and transparency.

So I created this star image to be a low quality, low resolution image. I purposely made the final stereogram un-sharp. And it got more likes than most of the images that Gene and I take hours and days to create and that we are very proud of. Frustrating.

[gwpriester]

Here's another stellar image.