Welcome to TalkGraphics.com
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Bracknell, UK
    Posts
    8,659

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    StPeters, MO USA
    Posts
    10,819

    Default Re: Nice to see Xara get a mention..

    Yeah!!!
    Larry a.k.a wizard509

    Never give up. You will never fail, but you may find a lot of ways that don't work.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    SW England
    Posts
    17,810

    Default Re: Nice to see Xara get a mention..

    But it is promoting Xara Page & Layout Designer 11, which is so stale:

    Version: 11.2.3.40788
    Filesize: 89.6MB
    Date: Sept 01, 2015

    Magix are selling it at £50 and yet Xara Photo & Graphic Designer has more features and is £5 cheaper and is up-to-date with a version date of March 29, 2021.

    Acorn
    Acorn - installed Xara software: Cloud+/Pro+ and most others back through time (to CC's Artworks). Contact for technical remediation/consultancy for your web designs.
    When we provide assistance, your responses are valuable as they benefit the community. TG Nuggets you might like. Report faults: Xara Cloud+/Pro+/Magix Legacy; Xara KB & Chat

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Placitas, New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    41,501

    Default Re: Nice to see Xara get a mention..

    Odd to see Quark as a InDesign substitute. Back in the day, InDesign was considered a poorman's QuarkXPress and while some thought InDesign had some cool features, it was never going to replace QuarkXpress.

    If I were not so old and intractable at this point I would start using Affinity Publisher. They have really designed a true publishing programs from the ground up instead of adding a feature here and pasting on part of a function there.

    But in terms of books — I've now done a dozen — I know how to get Xara to do what I need and I have been pretty happy with the results.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Nice to see Xara get a mention..

    Not that software comparison "reviews" were ever true dives into the software, but in the late 1980s and through the 1990s they were better. Closer to a true review.

    The linked one demonstrates the author has no true clue what layout software is and should do.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    4,503

    Default Re: Nice to see Xara get a mention..

    Quote Originally Posted by mwenz View Post

    The linked one demonstrates the author has no true clue what layout software is and should do.

    In all fairness, the author clearly indicates if the listed software is for beginners (such as, Xara) or professionals etc. (such as Affinity).

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    21,295

    Default Re: Nice to see Xara get a mention..

    Quote Originally Posted by mwenz View Post
    Not that software comparison "reviews" were ever true dives into the software, but in the late 1980s and through the 1990s they were better. Closer to a true review.

    The linked one demonstrates the author has no true clue what layout software is and should do.
    that's because [as I don't need to tell you] the article does not contain any review material

    to be a review the programs would need to have been tested in use and the results compared and benchmarked

    in fact what the article contains is just descriptive material

    it's as if egon ronay had written about menus and decor and the appearance of the staff... but not actually sampled the food....

    web is full of it
    -------------------------------
    Nothing lasts forever...

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •