Welcome to TalkGraphics.com
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    SW England
    Posts
    17,813

    Bug New Image Filename Feature

    Dear Xara...

    Could we please have any sort of response or update on this topic:

    1. https://www.talkgraphics.com/showthr...ming-Feature-I
    2. https://www.talkgraphics.com/showthr...ing-Feature-II
    3. https://www.talkgraphics.com/showthr...ng-Feature-III
    4. https://www.talkgraphics.com/showthr...ing-Feature-IV

    Not a single Xara employee has visited these Threads unless they are not signing in to do so.

    For a company that proclaims TG is their go-to "Online forum" [Help > More [app] > Online forum] and fails to engage is reprehensible.
    To waste three months does not make your Problem go away; hiding is not a solution.

    The tl:dr of this Issue:


    • A single shape has an Image Filename applied. Regardless of Effects applied after this, the same Image Filename should be rendered. Bug - You apply an arbitrary number affix that changes on where the design has been closed and re-opened.
    • Clones of the same shape render with one Image Filename. Scale any Clone. Bug - You create an affixed additional file. Your underlying code is CSS, applying different Width/ Height and transforms (scaling, rounding, shadows); none of these require another file.
    • Custom bullets fail dramatically. Bug - Your internal database loses filename references and applies the wrong name to the wrong image as well as affixing lots of numbers.
    • Bug - Placing a shape on non-integer co-ordinates results in an affixed additional file.

    Clearly, you have a fundamental design failure that probably precedes the Image Filenaming Feature but Huh!

    328 images generated for a SmartTable:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	8x10 Smart Table.jpg 
Views:	67 
Size:	176.2 KB 
ID:	129518

    Facebook alone has 40 images (fb+fb[1..9].webp|.png) where one Font Awesome symbol or one SVG would do.
    20 separate image fetches. Won't Google web core Vitals be pleased!

    When I am trying to deliver professional websites, I am being floundered by this sloppiness.
    It is not just the extra files, it is the randomness and having to second-guess what it actually rendered; this is destroying or forcing code scripts and CSS coding to new heights and absurdity.

    Acorn
    Acorn - installed Xara software: Cloud+/Pro+ and most others back through time (to CC's Artworks). Contact for technical remediation/consultancy for your web designs.
    When we provide assistance, your responses are valuable as they benefit the community. TG Nuggets you might like. Report faults: Xara Cloud+/Pro+/Magix Legacy; Xara KB & Chat

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Harwich, Essex, England
    Posts
    21,910

    Default Re: New Image Filename Feature

    I can only second you regarding these issues and the total silence from Xara.
    Egg

    Intel i7 - 4790K Quad Core + 16 GB Ram + NVIDIA Geforce GTX 1660 Graphics Card + MSI Optix Mag321 Curv monitor
    + Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB SSD + 232 GB SSD + 250 GB SSD portable drive + ISP = BT + Web Hosting = TSO Host

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •