Selector handle problem DPX+

[Egg Bramhill]

A fail, sorry.

Why change these things that have worked extremely well in the past. Isn't this just change for change sake? Not only that but as posters have pointed out it doesn't function in a meaningful manner as did the previous iteration.

[Acorn]

Another annoyance is the bounding box is a lot of eye candy that actually distracts from the design.

None of it is selactable, other than the control regions so why is it needed?

The bounding box is so intimate with a Rectangle that it makes the Object appear damaged.
This affects the presentation of my buttons.



Acorn

[Acorn]

Dear Xara...

I am concerned that you are cherry-picking Threads and ignoring others.

To update a product and declare it is in development is rum, inviting people to beta, going forward.

Have you read https://www.talkgraphics.com/showthr...on-consistency, which is in favour but with a twist?
Have you read https://www.talkgraphics.com/showthr...Selectors-Fail, which is a disaster?

In summary, the new controls get in the way at low zoom, have little to indicate the modes available, get cut off, obscure other design objects, are inconsistent and just vanish.

Thank you for the Registry setting to revert.

Acorn