Stereogram - Remind you of anyone?

[TwoEdgedSword]

TwoEdgedSword - I have never seen that little utility. It does a pretty OK job determining the mass of the hidden object. But if the algorithm was cross eyes (Convergent) as the text reads, then the stereogram would appear to be going in and not out.

Your latest stereogram does not render, so perhaps there is an error in the write-up.

I can see where it says cross eyes, but I fail to see the dotted teas.

[gwpriester]

Your latest stereogram does not render, so perhaps there is an error in the write-up.

I can see where it says cross eyes, but I fail to see the dotted teas.

Can you see the actual image I posted?

Attached is the depth image. The software I use uses the depth image to determine the shape of the hidden image.

[Jonopen]

Both version work for me, although I personally found the second one (the one coming out) much easier to get started.

[gwpriester]

Both version work for me, although I personally found the second one (the one coming out) much easier to get started.

Ah, then you are viewing crossed eye. If you view parallel, both eyes looking straight ahead and focusing just beyond the image, the first version comes forward. The second version will appear like the inside of a mold. I do not like cross eyes viewing, I feel like my eyes are straining, but when I do, I get much greater depth.

[Penny O'Rorke]

I get both versions straight away, but prefer the first The second one is a bit spooky!

[gray]

I find both versions easy to see, but also prefer the first for viewing.