a sketch

[handrawn]

no probs that is art as opposed to design

[Jonopen]

Hope you don't mind but I asked my resident art critic (a numskull who lives in my head who gets a bit unruly now and then) to take a peek and here’s what he said...

“an interesting and intriguing monochromatic digital abstract sketch, open to both artistic interpretation and meaning. The descriptive title of the piece may, to some extent, provide a clue to the artists own connotation and undertone, but ultimately the loose, mostly pointalistic composition is sufficiently unrepresentational to leave the viewer exploring their own thoughts and perhaps a desire to know and understand more than the sketch and title themselves render alone.”

Jono :-)

[handrawn]

your critic may pass by this way again

[ss-kalm]

I see the one on the left walking away haughtily, and the one on the right saying " Screw you then!"

[handrawn]

that i like nice one

[edulofter]

I only found one lady.
Is there a problem with my eyes???

, your sketch is really too artistic.

[wizard509]

I suppose I see a lady but to me mostly I see a groundhog on the right, the left image I interpret nothing.

[handrawn]

I only found one lady.
Is there a problem with my eyes???

, your sketch is really too artistic.

artistic is of course the point

all that eyes do is pick up reflected light and not much else, it is the brain that does the seeing and that is very much interpretive

[Egg Bramhill]

Who does the dog belong to?

[handrawn]

artistically: ownership of the dog is not explicit in the composition

philosophically: it's owner, should it happen to have one