Welcome to TalkGraphics.com
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Default Why such poor results with Background Erase?

    For some reason, I thought background erase had boundary detection logic that made it easy to isolate images. But my experience over a dozen uses has left me doubting the processing and/or the methods I use.

    I'm following exactly the steps show in this article:
    http://support.xara.com/index.php?/K...ckground-erase

    But my resulting images never have the sharp boundaries it implies I can get.

    Admittedly, the range of color (mostly grays) in the image I'm currently working with is low. Nonetheless, there is a clear edge to the image. And I've had artifacts show up even on images with dramatically darker backgrounds. Up to now, I've resorted to tediously outlining an image to get a decent result.

    Is there a setting or method I should try?

    Thanks in advance for any suggestions.


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Need clear boundary.PNG 
Views:	164 
Size:	146.3 KB 
ID:	109968

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sunshine Coast BC, Canada. In a beautiful part of BC's temperate rainforest
    Posts
    9,864

    Default Re: Why such poor results with Background Erase?

    Here is a video that may help.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    My current Xara software: Designer Pro 365 12.6

    Good Morning Sunshine.ca | Good Morning Sunshine Online(a weekly humorous publication created with XDP and exported as a web document) | Angelize Online resource shop | My Video Tutorials | My DropBox |
    Autocorrect: It can be your worst enema.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Why such poor results with Background Erase?

    Quote Originally Posted by angelize View Post
    Here is a video that may help.
    Actually, I had watched that very video before I made my post. It does give a good result, but the page I referenced certainly gave me the impression that a few "identifying swaths" were all that's needed ... and the software would do the rest.

    Rather than try "detailed swaths", I'd much rather outline the object and be certain of what I'll get.

    I was just expecting more from Xara.

    Thanks for responding.


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Brushes.PNG 
Views:	135 
Size:	162.7 KB 
ID:	109969

  4. #4

    Default Re: Why such poor results with Background Erase?

    I do not know about the software that can fulfill wishes. Xara removes background is not worse than the other software.
    White background can be easily removed with "select colors" tool too.

    I personally prefer the shape tool. It takes not much longer than the masking. But the clean result is guaranteed.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    186

    Default Re: Why such poor results with Background Erase?

    A lot of Contours problems are caused by using a JPEG original (the blocky artifacts are typical of JPEG), but this can be got around by erasing close into the foreground. For example I was able to produce a pass-able background erase of a simular image in a few minutes.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PlainCutout.jpg 
Views:	156 
Size:	24.9 KB 
ID:	109970
    Attached Files Attached Files

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sunshine Coast BC, Canada. In a beautiful part of BC's temperate rainforest
    Posts
    9,864

    Default Re: Why such poor results with Background Erase?

    The image I used in my video was a jpeg but it was a fairly high resolution image.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    My current Xara software: Designer Pro 365 12.6

    Good Morning Sunshine.ca | Good Morning Sunshine Online(a weekly humorous publication created with XDP and exported as a web document) | Angelize Online resource shop | My Video Tutorials | My DropBox |
    Autocorrect: It can be your worst enema.

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •