Private Messages (PM's)

[puw]

Hi, I did an advanced search using 'private messages' and got 3,000 ++ dating back to the stone age (lol) of which 99.9% in the first few pages had nothing to do with pm's.

Tried refining the search and organising the results, no real value.

So, please can you help tell me when I will be allowed to pm other members. Thank you

The purpose of such pm's is discussion of a topic, specific info that may help them or asking for advice in an area they know about that is not Xara specific.

[gwpriester]

Or more to the point, when your messages won't be sent to moderation. This forum does not have a moderator so new messages are automatically moderated until someone stumbles along and approves them.

I'm not sure what the magic number is before you get PM permission. I'm going to guess and say somewhere around 25.

[pauland]

There are non-Xara forums here. It's a bit of a waste to ask people non-Xara questions about other software via PM's when others might benefit on the forum.

It's not what PMs is intended for, is it?

[puw]

You misinterpreted my intention for non-xara. I'm talking about buying, using, shortfalls with certain types/models, workarounds etc - graphics tablets using Xara. Hope that eases your conscience 'pauland' Ref the purpose of pm's, that's too much of a personal question I have no problem asking what others may think is a stupid question, that some may think "Go and google it" etc. So sometimes to save such members the angst, a pm comes in handy. PM's could be asking "Did you see that program on xyz last night?" PM's take on all manner of forms. But, when it comes to something useful/helpful, that may even arise via a PM, then I 110% agree, get it in a new post!

A typical stupid question about the tablets would be, why do people sketch out on paper, scan it, then sketch over it on a tablet? The initial sketches I see are always very rough and then the tablet sketches are always better. Why not do a rough on the tablet and then make a new layer?

You see pauland, I'm seriously looking at getting a tablet, but all online reference to which one works, all references relate to say PS or CD. Very little, very, very little from Xara users. I would be an unhappy chappie if I got one, only to find I can't use Xara with it and have to go back to the 'drawing board' (like the pun?) and learn an app that I thankfully dropped years back for Xara. Even if I found a post on here with some details about Xara & tabs, it's going to be perhaps too old with the current tablets available.

I would seriously love to make a post asking 'experienced' members for help, advice, recommendations, pitfalls etc - but I came across a post by a member apologising for bringing up the dreaded subject yet again (that apparently "had" been done to death). Back to ANGST and hence PM's of a non-Xara kind of related PM

--------

Thanks Gary , that was exactly what I was looking for, a rough number idea. I'm sure when signing up I saw a number but can't recall it, but within the FAQ there's no mention of such a number, only 'how to PM'. And there's no "Rule's" sticky that might have this info in it.

[gwpriester]

Paul gets a bit grumpy sometimes. But underneath all that grumpiness, he's really an OK person.

[pauland]

You misinterpreted my intention for non-xara. I'm talking about buying, using, shortfalls with certain types/models, workarounds etc - graphics tablets using Xara. Hope that eases your conscience 'pauland' Ref the purpose of pm's, that's too much of a personal question I have no problem asking what others may think is a stupid question, that some may think "Go and google it" etc. So sometimes to save such members the angst, a pm comes in handy. PM's could be asking "Did you see that program on xyz last night?" PM's take on all manner of forms. But, when it comes to something useful/helpful, that may even arise via a PM, then I 110% agree, get it in a new post!

A typical stupid question about the tablets would be, why do people sketch out on paper, scan it, then sketch over it on a tablet? The initial sketches I see are always very rough and then the tablet sketches are always better. Why not do a rough on the tablet and then make a new layer?

You see pauland, I'm seriously looking at getting a tablet, but all online reference to which one works, all references relate to say PS or CD. Very little, very, very little from Xara users. I would be an unhappy chappie if I got one, only to find I can't use Xara with it and have to go back to the 'drawing board' (like the pun?) and learn an app that I thankfully dropped years back for Xara. Even if I found a post on here with some details about Xara & tabs, it's going to be perhaps too old with the current tablets available.

I would seriously love to make a post asking 'experienced' members for help, advice, recommendations, pitfalls etc - but I came across a post by a member apologising for bringing up the dreaded subject yet again (that apparently "had" been done to death). Back to ANGST and hence PM's of a non-Xara kind of related PM

--------

Thanks Gary , that was exactly what I was looking for, a rough number idea. I'm sure when signing up I saw a number but can't recall it, but within the FAQ there's no mention of such a number, only 'how to PM'. And there's no "Rule's" sticky that might have this info in it.

I don't know why you think my conscience is bothered.

if you want to talk about using tablets with Xara, do it on the forum publicly. Plenty of people are interested and those that aren't can just ignore it.

people like sketching because the feel comfortable with pencil and paper. It's not the same on a tablet. It's a matter of individual choice.

Commonly sketching on paper is more expressive and throwaway, then people take those rough sketches, scan and refine them on the computer.

Some people like to start digitally.

It's whatever works for you. It's not a question of which is best.

Have your discussions publicly. It's what forums are for.

[pauland]

Paul gets a bit grumpy sometimes. But underneath all that grumpiness, he's really an OK person.

It's true, but I wasn't grumpy here. It's such a waste to be having a discussion behind closed doors when others would be interested in the subject and gain from it.

[puw]

Paul - when I see a post title that reflects "I came across a post by a member apologising for bringing up the dreaded subject yet again (that apparently "had" been done to death)", that's a big warning sign to me NOT to do THIS subject publicly.

Regardless, if I want to PM someone and I have the access to, I will!!! So please don't lay down a law that you think must be obeyed - and yes, you are coming across as grumpy right now even if you don't think you are

Since I came across an amazing post by a member stating he's just got a tablet, unable to pm him, I asked in his post if he could advise me, of which numerous experienced members responded to his post after me but did not in any way give any advice my way. Now in your rule book, you might think that is correct, not to hijack a post and lead it into another discussion - but I've read plenty of posts that go all round the houses, way off the initial topic, and no one breathed down their necks saying you can't do that.

So can Mr Grumpy & Mr Rule Book take a breather for 5 please

I was asking a simple question. One Gary kindly gave me the answer to.

I did not ask for a lecture, nor wanted one. I will in the future be happy not to ask you anything if you so like I will also reduce any questions I have by 98% for the forum, since I don't particularly want jumping on because you think the question is a bad one

Please do note all the smiling faces above, and that they translate into a nice, calm, happy person LOL

[pauland]

There's no rule book and I thought everyone might benefit from the discussion as simple as that. From what you've posted so far, it will do us all a favour if they are PMs.

You'll have to wait a bit longer.

No more pompous, patronising advice is required, even with a smiley face.

[haakoo]

When starting to be a member on a forum you should have read the rules.
That way you would have known that pm's are only possible after a fair amount of engaging in the forum itself.
This makes sense,because you need to know the persons on the forum first before addressing them on a personal level.
At least I would.

Hans