Paul
I preferred the first smoke effect. The purple does not look convincing, the black (gray) smoke does.
Do I recognize some shapes from a very eary tutorial under that smoke?
Gary
Gary Priester
Moderator Person
Be It Rarely So Humble...
Paul
I preferred the first smoke effect. The purple does not look convincing, the black (gray) smoke does.
Do I recognize some shapes from a very eary tutorial under that smoke?
Gary
Gary Priester
Moderator Person
Be It Rarely So Humble...
Gary W. Priester
Mr. Moderator Emeritus Dude, Sir
gwpriester.com | eyetricks-3d-stereograms.com | eyeTricks on Facebook | eyeTricks on YouTube | eyeTricks on Instagram
Gary - If you are refering to your exploding ball, the effect seem to be similar, but it is actually my quick improvisation so my smoke didn't have to come out of emptyness [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif[/img]
All i did was drawing some freehand shapes, grouped them, and kloned them twice. I moved the klones to back, moved one of them downwards some pixels and applied a blend (from yellow to orange). Another freehand shape behind the "cracked ground" was drawn and filled with fractal plasma (yellow-orange)
About the purple smoke - it wasn't really meant to be realistic, it was more of a association to (correct English syntax?) Deep Purple's hit "Smoke On The Water", combining the both. get it? [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_smile.gif[/img]
Turan - I forgot to tell about my smoke: I didn't use feathering, but circular transparency with a curved profile (now I don't remember in which direction it was curved, but I guess you can try it out by yourself)
-Paul
Paul the Gnurfmeister!
Home: http://www.gnurf.net/v3/ | My stuff for sale: http://www.zazzle.com/gnurf* | Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/pasoderholm
Bookmarks