Has this been discussed before?

[paulferz]

I don't get back here to post very much and don't know if this has been discussed. In Xara 2 the GIF export was fast and furious and worked 95% Ok for web work. In XaraX it is slower but has better features - all in all a pretty good tradeoff.

The only real aggrevating thing to us is the arrangement of export options. The most needed options are scattered across three tabs. For the serious web developer these need to be readily accessible on the primary export screen.

Since a picture is supposed to be worth a thousand words..and saves typing..attached is my description.

[paulferz]

I don't get back here to post very much and don't know if this has been discussed. In Xara 2 the GIF export was fast and furious and worked 95% Ok for web work. In XaraX it is slower but has better features - all in all a pretty good tradeoff.

The only real aggrevating thing to us is the arrangement of export options. The most needed options are scattered across three tabs. For the serious web developer these need to be readily accessible on the primary export screen.

Since a picture is supposed to be worth a thousand words..and saves typing..attached is my description.

[Mark Goodall]

Apologies for the values not agreeing.
This disagreement betwen the size values occurs when using the "maintain screen anti-aliasing" option in the bitmap size tab.
The value shown in the preview pane is the correct value.

Mark Goodall
Xara Ltd