Two logos for two G's

**juergen** · 08 September 2010, 04:48 AM

I prefer no. 2 by far. Its named two G's, I see two G's. The first one is too complicated for me.
But I guess everybody will see different things looking at the same pictures.

Juergen

**iamtheblues** · 08 September 2010, 06:01 AM

I'd leave out the apostrophe if I were you, Gary.
Saludos,
Bob.

**Rik** · 08 September 2010, 08:00 AM

Hi Gary.

Fantastic that you liked my effort. Use the design, use the idea and in fact you said that your partner prefers a heavier 2, anyway.

In my opinion, I think it has more effect.

As for the apostrophe that Bob mentions.
If you have something that belongs to someone or something, then you need an apostrophe.
If there is more than one of something, then you don't use the apostrophe.
So, it depends upon what you are trying to say with the company name?!

Or, you could simply call it '2 G Publishing'

**iamtheblues** · 08 September 2010, 09:46 AM

Originally Posted by Rik

...Or, you could simply call it '2 G Publishing'

Or even 2 Gs Publishing. Given that the topic title is "Two logos for two G's" I'd say that there is no possession intended. "Two G's Two logos" would indicate possession but as it stands, for it to be possessive you would have to ask the question " Two logos for two G's what?", suggesting that the topic title is incomplete in some way.

Saludos,
Bob.

**Soquili** · 08 September 2010, 01:50 PM

I like the second logo in your original post Gary.

**gwpriester** · 08 September 2010, 02:42 PM

I agree with Bob (for once

). It does not need the apostrophe because it is not possessive. It is just more than one G and less than three Gs.

Gene suggested 2G 3D since that is what we do. So I tried a solution with that in mind. It works but I always prefer simple.

I also tried a very elegant 2 (Poster Bodoni MT) which plays nicely with the simplicity of the D shape.

**Black Panther** · 08 September 2010, 03:20 PM

Hi Gary,
I like the second one with the elegant 2 (Poster Bodoni MT), looks great.
Best Regards BP

**wizard509** · 12 September 2010, 02:42 AM

I liked the second too. Until Fred pointed it out I didn't see the 2 in the first one, and was struggling to make sense of the design, but now that I see it I think it's very clever. Therefore my first impression stands, I find number 2 the strongest and has the most visual impact. Mostly it just appeals to me. Just my 2 cents worth.