Scroll Stereogram - Two ways

**gwpriester** · 30 June 2010, 10:26 PM

The first version is parallel. The second is for cross eyed viewing.

**zaphodeist** · 30 June 2010, 11:02 PM

Thank you Gary! The cross-eyed one ... suddenly materialised

Two now!

**a4hire** · 30 June 2010, 11:43 PM

Very nice Gary
Took me a few minutes before I saw it but when I did start to see it it was very 3D looked like I could reach out and touch it.

**ss-kalm** · 01 July 2010, 03:07 AM

I can view both using the cross eyed method, but the first one doesn't look right (DUH!) Thanks for posting the crosseyed one for us challenged individuals.

No matter how hard I try I cannot focus past the monitor. My eyes always go back to image. At least I can join in by going crosseyed.

**gwpriester** · 01 July 2010, 02:33 PM

Oddly enough, when I view a stereogram cross-eyed, the image has more form and depth and seems slightly smaller.

I don't like cross eye viewing because it hurts my eye muscles. But I can shift back and forth pretty easily.

**gnurf** · 02 July 2010, 11:41 AM

No matter how I try, the cross-eyed versions always appear "inverted" to me

**Soquili** · 02 July 2010, 11:48 AM

I agree Paul. I cannot cross my eyes to see those type of stereograms.

When I view them as parallel they are inverted.

Great stereogram Gary! I envy your creativity with the depth maps and your choice of texture.

**gwpriester** · 02 July 2010, 02:55 PM

Cross eyed viewing is hard.

I think about 80-90% of the people view stereograms with parallel vision. The others view them cross eyed.

It took me a long time to figure this out that this was why some people would tell me they could see the 3D but it all looked reversed. Or like the cross eyed version looks to most of us when we view it with parallel vision.

**HayTay** · 03 July 2010, 04:37 PM

This stereogram reminds me more of a butter or chocolate curl (garnish) than a scroll. An excellent rendition, though, no matter how you look at it.

It's made me hungry,
Harry