I thought I would post this before starting up XXP (again). There are plenty of posts about access violations, empty files and the need to use XAReg to create .bak files so I will avoid repetition. I just sent the following note to Xara support:
-----------------------
"I continue to experience these with the latest one being a 0x7C911DAA while resizing a page. No choice but to exit the program without saving changes. Yesterday I had a crash that ended up with file - containing 25 pages - having 0 in it. I had to restore a file from the previous day and regenerate my changes (even though I was saving the file every 15 minutes or so). I now use the 3rd party add on XAReg to create .bak files.
I have disabled all spyware and the machine I use is routinely checked for virus/spyware and is also boot defragmented and Chkdsk'd.
My concern is why would you make the update available only to registered users when a person who is "Trialing" the product cannot get the latest code? Does the latest download not reflect the latest updates? Surely you would want to put your best foot forward to a potential buyer?
I have determined that sites of this size or more with 10 layers would not be able to be developed in WD or XX because of the lack of the extensive object gallery that XXP has. However I cannot see upgrading to XXP if the stability is not there. This will force me to relegate XX to prototyping only.
I do love the product but it seems there are issues surrounding losing files and access violations that seem to pop up routinely".
----------------
Am I missing something here? Why would Xara not make the latest code available during a software trial? I am licensed for XX and WD - neither of which I would consider using for an extensive website without the object gallery that XXP has.
I would be be particularly interested to hear from anyone doing extensive multi-page web development or proto-typing who is not getting access violations. (Not the graphics intensive 1 page folks).
Bookmarks