Re: The WD HTML structure furore
I think the point that everyone has forgotten is that at the end of the day, "CONTENT IS KING!", it matters not how your site is generated, it's content that matters... static layout, dynamic layout, CMS driven, whatever... if you don't keep your content fresh, people don't come back to your site, why don't we set the furore aside and let John get on with developing XWD to the next level.
Rome wasn't built in a day, nor were any of the other "industry standard" authoring tools which are "mature" inasmuch as they have had numerous releases, Fusion ELEVEN springs to mind! It's good that John (and Charles) take part in this forum but to have to justify why things are done in a particular way is a little unfair, if they didn't raise their heads above the parapet, this discussion would have died a death already.
XWD is a mere "fledgling" application, it's three days old... look at it this way, what is it, less than a year ago that Xtreme 4 introduced HTML export, consider the advances that have been made in the interim to produce XWD.. where will we be in another twelve months?
"Second class fairway is better than first class rough!"
Bookmarks