Welcome to TalkGraphics.com
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Blend problem

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada.
    Posts
    4,619

    Default Re: Blend problem

    Isn't blending from A to B and B to C to D etc. easy enough.

    Hans' solution didn't seem that difficult to me and was exactly what I expected to see. Profiles work perfectly etc.
    Last edited by ss-kalm; 11 September 2008 at 03:56 PM.
    Keith
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    There are 10 types of people in this world .... Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Raisio, Finland
    Posts
    1,341

    Default Re: Blend problem

    Quote Originally Posted by ss-kalm View Post
    Isn't blending from A to B and B to C to D etc. easy enough.

    Hans' solution didn't seem that difficult to me and was exactly what I expected to see. Profiles work perfectly etc.
    No, it isn't easy enough when you can do it with one blend

    And my memory was only part wrong: the "perspective" blend I remember was done in CorelDraw. I just tested in CD and worked as I expected (and I thought it was logical enough to work in Xtreme as well). Make an ellipse, duplicate and flip the copy, create blend.

    As I said, I've used the multi-blend workaround, but in this case the CorelDraw way is easier to use if you are making for example perspectival(sp?) images.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	problem-blend2.png 
Views:	338 
Size:	4.9 KB 
ID:	51949  
    Paul the Gnurfmeister!
    Home: http://www.gnurf.net/v3/ | My stuff for sale: http://www.zazzle.com/gnurf* | Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/pasoderholm



  3. #13

    Default Re: Blend problem

    Yes agreed in this instance CD is much simpler.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada.
    Posts
    4,619

    Default Re: Blend problem

    Don't get me wrong, I agree the single blend method is much better and if the bottom copy is flipped, it's logical to assume that the stages of the blend should also have been flipped. It's much more intuitive and works far better from every point of view. All I was trying to point out, was that in the absence of the "right" way it should be done, that the A-B-C blend was not a difficult workaround.
    Keith
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    There are 10 types of people in this world .... Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •