Welcome to TalkGraphics.com
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    3,297

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    Nice stuff John especially the sharpened version.
    Norman. The Flying Scotsman
    IP

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Brockville, Ontario, Canada.
    Posts
    4,619

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    Phenomenal photography John!
    Keith
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    There are 10 types of people in this world .... Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
    IP

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Box Elder, SD, USA
    Posts
    4,034

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    Thanks Keith and Norman!

    I have found that the sharpening works much better when used on a larger bitmap. When one is displaying a huge shot on the net, some of the detail can be lost when the shot is reduced. Sharpening the picture brings back some of the detail without making it too obvious.
    John Rayner
    For my Photography see:
    http://www.draginet.com
    Facebook
    IP

  4. #4

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    nice work John
    greetings
    IP

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Box Elder, SD, USA
    Posts
    4,034

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    Thank you Germaine.
    John Rayner
    For my Photography see:
    http://www.draginet.com
    Facebook
    IP

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Mount Barker. S.A. Australia
    Posts
    550

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    Really great shots.
    Moon photography is not easy. What lense (or telescope) did you use John.
    Rupert
    IP

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Box Elder, SD, USA
    Posts
    4,034

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    I will second that... about moon shots not being easy.

    The first shots (the large ones) are with a 1000mm cheap lens mounted to a Pentax K20D. The lens is why it took me many attempts over several years to get a decent shot. The lens is totally manual. I get no exposure info nor focus indication with this lens. It is all trial and error.

    The small shot is with a 300mm autofocus lens. It is much easier to take shots with it, but the image is much, much smaller.
    John Rayner
    For my Photography see:
    http://www.draginet.com
    Facebook
    IP

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •