Welcome to TalkGraphics.com
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Box Elder, SD, USA
    Posts
    4,034

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    I will second that... about moon shots not being easy.

    The first shots (the large ones) are with a 1000mm cheap lens mounted to a Pentax K20D. The lens is why it took me many attempts over several years to get a decent shot. The lens is totally manual. I get no exposure info nor focus indication with this lens. It is all trial and error.

    The small shot is with a 300mm autofocus lens. It is much easier to take shots with it, but the image is much, much smaller.
    John Rayner
    For my Photography see:
    http://www.draginet.com
    Facebook
    IP

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Armenia
    Posts
    476

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    Yes, John. There are very beautiful shots of the moon. Very.!! And so close!!! I like them.
    IP

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Mount Barker. S.A. Australia
    Posts
    550

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    John,

    I took this one when the eclipse happened, I think in 07.
    600mm lens (manual). As per usual with eclipses the clouds came in but they elapsed long enough to allow me to take a number of shots. I also had a few problems with my camera to add to the degree of difficulty.

    Your shot is so amazing closes.
    Rupert.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	moon-eclips 122(ed.JPG 
Views:	283 
Size:	19.8 KB 
ID:	51478  
    IP

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Box Elder, SD, USA
    Posts
    4,034

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    Thank you Lilu and Rupert...

    Rupert,

    That is a nice shot with a 600mm. Have you thought about getting a doubler? You can find them for not that much used. They are typically a manual use only item. I have one that I was going to try on my 1000mm but it makes the the moon too large to fit in the frame (1000mmX2x1.5=3000mm 35 mm equivalent). I have used it with half of my 1000mm (500mmX2X1.5=1500mm 35 mm equivalent), but the shot is about the same (quality wise) so I didn't use it this month.

    I wanted to capture the eclipse but it was raining in this neck of the woods.
    John Rayner
    For my Photography see:
    http://www.draginet.com
    Facebook
    IP

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    995

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    good one john, nice and sharp...I have never bothered to take a shot of the moon..it sounds difficult so I can't see me doing it...regrads tao
    IP

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Negros Occidental, Philippines
    Posts
    442

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    John,

    I seem to have missed this thread earlier, but finding it has been a visual joy.
    I am full of admiration for your persistence and the quality of the photographs.
    TJB
    IP

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Box Elder, SD, USA
    Posts
    4,034

    Default Re: Full moon part #3

    Thanks Roger and TJB.

    Roger,

    Any shot is hard to get right unless you have tried to take them a few times. I would have to practice quiet a bit to capture a band in action like you can. The first couple shots would not be worth viewing.

    I have taken quiet a few sunsets, and a moon shot is not much harder. The manual lens is the tricky part. Trying to get a good focus with only the viewfinder as a guide is tough. Lots of trial and error. Do you have a large telephoto?
    John Rayner
    For my Photography see:
    http://www.draginet.com
    Facebook
    IP

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •