As a result of the last pages of this thread, I've decided to post the following and see what happens. I am doing so to figure out what can and cannot be discussed on this forum, as the header states "Computer problems, or landing on Mars. Here you can go off-topic."
Last December a member posted a thread in this forum in which they stated that they were a member of a political body, and they knew for a fact that one of the members of that body was corrupt, and was not working for the best interests of the people who had voted them in. The member making that statement said that ethics dictated that they could not let the people who had voted them into office know about the other member's actions.
I responded that it wasn't ethics at stake, but prudence. I believed that ethics dictated that the non-corrupt member somehow figure out a way to fix the situation so that those being governed got the governance that they believed they had voted into office. I also said that it would be wise to do so prudently, as the wrong moves could be detrimental to the concerned member and the body being governed. It wasn't 'ethics' at stake, it was 'prudence.'
As part of that thread, the moderators had been asked what could and could not be discussed in the off-topic boards. The thread was pulled, even though it was extremely socially relevant and redeeming, and there remains no answer to what we can and cannot discuss on this forum. I'm hoping that by posting this thread, I find out that socially redeeming discussions are wanted on this board. I always believed they were, but the way the earlier thread was pulled left me in doubt.
Best wishes,
David
Bookmarks