Welcome to TalkGraphics.com
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Default

    Hey,
    i was looking at flat bed scanners, there seem to be alot at 600x1200 dpi and a few at 1200x2400 dpi.
    is it overkill to get a 1200x2400? how much better quality is it, is it worth it?
    cheers
    chuck
    IP

  2. #2

    Default

    Hey,
    i was looking at flat bed scanners, there seem to be alot at 600x1200 dpi and a few at 1200x2400 dpi.
    is it overkill to get a 1200x2400? how much better quality is it, is it worth it?
    cheers
    chuck
    IP

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    the twilight zone
    Posts
    1,238

    Default

    Everything depends on what you want to do with it. Is a PentiumIII 800MHz better than a PentiumIII500? Is 256 RAM better than 128?

    Only one thing: some budget scanners like some of the Canon brand use a different type on scanning device, and are therefore limited to real flat surfaces.

    So ask yourself: 1/ How much can I invest?
    2/ Do I need to scan slides?
    3/ Do I need to scan 4x5 transparancies?
    4/ Do I want a simple "intelligent" scanner or do I want to be able to tweak everything manually?
    5/ Do I want to invest in better software (SilverfastAI)?

    And when you answered these questions, you eliminate at least 80% of the possible scanners.

    My personal opinion (not to start a discussion, please), based on personal experience:

    Agfa Snapscan20 in a good basic scanner.
    Snapscan50 can scan slides and negatives and is worth its money.
    Epson1640SUPhoto is better, costs the double but does a reasonable job for print etc, especially when you add the SilverfastAI software. (This is the one I have and use). You can scan 4x5 Inch transparancies, slides and negatives with it. You get Photoshop5LE with it.
    HP5100 disappointed me. But these are, I repeat, personal opinions.

    Remind that none of these scanners is a real professional high end scanner: these cost at least five times the price of the Epson and much, much more.


    Practically speaking: scan at the highest resolution possible and then adapt in your bitmap editing program.

    If you don't work against time, time often works for you.
    IP

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    NS Canada
    Posts
    212

    Default

    Helpful answer, Erik!

    I'd also like to add, start with the best photo possible. This sounds like a no-brainer but you'd be surprised how many people have said to me, "Well, you can fix that with your computer, right?" of a ridiculously poor quality image!

    cfn ... Jen
    Jen Worden
    Web Developer
    www.meadoworks.com
    cfn ... Jen

    Jen Worden
    Web Developer
    www.meadoworks.com
    IP

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,436

    Default

    As a cheaper option to the 1640, I'm happy with the 1240U - it has the transparency adapter too.

    www.thelondonhouse.co.uk
    Simon
    ------------------------------
    www.tlaconsultancy.co.uk
    www.bricksandbrass.co.uk
    IP

  6. #6

    Default

    ok, thanks, i absorbed all that.
    chuck
    IP

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •