Welcome to TalkGraphics.com
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts
    673

    Default

    Use the force, Michael. Don't succumb to the dark side, and you'll soon learn Gary Priester is really your father. ;-)

    joroho
    Wise men still seek Him.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA USA
    Posts
    215

    Default

    If you go with a frames version, offer users one without frames. Frames load faster, but when you save the page and try to print it, the choice to print the current frame or the page as laid out on the screen isn't always available. I also like the choice to go with Shock/Flash version vs. HTML version.

    Just a suggestion [img]/infopop/emoticons/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Leigh, Lancashire, UK
    Posts
    436

    Default

    I'm not currently planning to use any flash (although this may change!), so there is no problem there.

    I am not a fan of frames, as it makes development, promotion and user experience more difficult so I generally avoid frames. But lets not get into a discussion about the merits of frames (there are other places for that!).

    I will plough on with the design now, as I find I am fairly happy with this and I shall get on to creating some real content for it soon.

    Michael Ward



    <img="http://www.cashflowstore.com/temp/sig.gif">

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •