artistically: ownership of the dog is not explicit in the composition
philosophically: it's owner, should it happen to have one
;)
Type: Posts; User: handrawn; Keyword(s):
artistically: ownership of the dog is not explicit in the composition
philosophically: it's owner, should it happen to have one
;)
artistic is of course the point :)
all that eyes do is pick up reflected light and not much else, it is the brain that does the seeing and that is very much interpretive
that i like nice one :)
your critic may pass by this way again :D
no probs that is art as opposed to design
there are quite a few ways of looking at it - here's one:
124427
and another for the lady with the flowing dress and feathered hat [if that is what you see]
124429
but you may noe see...
ah the representational artist speaking :p
I might just as well have called it 'a stroll in the park' or left it untitiled
no problem if you do not see what the label suggests - labels are...
in painter using leaky pen and soft cover
two [victorian] ladies and a [21st century] dog.... ghost watches dog sensing ghost
124423