I know a longer one using 'had' - you can stretch it to eleven in a row, but I saw it in the readers digest decades ago and it had only nine which was probably better grammar; it's all in the...
Type: Posts; User: handrawn; Keyword(s):
I know a longer one using 'had' - you can stretch it to eleven in a row, but I saw it in the readers digest decades ago and it had only nine which was probably better grammar; it's all in the...