Artifacts made around the image instead of the image being stretched.
Printable View
Artifacts made around the image instead of the image being stretched.
I think this is what the feature is supposed to do. It takes the edge of the image and just repeats it. It does not stretch the image.
If there is a shift and some of the bleed shows, it will look like a mistake.
heck - switch it off in the registry as was advised in your other thread
maybe mike w or some other print guru can explain, but to me that looks screwed - I mean the whole point of a bleed is to allow for the cut to be offset, otherwise why have it, and then you get pixellation...:eek:
IF the cutter at the printer (not sure the name for it) comes down and misses the crop marks by fraction of measurement, you will get a freaking weird edge. Enlarged the image or something else outside the crop marks How it is now is unacceptable. And yes I am not using it, and I do not want to rub it into xaras nose, but hell get it right, why make something that is useless?
Here is a good article for Xara programmers to read about trim and crop marks. https://www.bindersinc.com/resources...bleed-printing
I know nothing about printing but why not increase the size of your image by 103%, this saves the bit that does the following:
Quote:
When exporting to PDF/X, objects that touch the edge of the page will extend into the bleed area by replicating the edge pixels all around the page edge. This is to help prevent gaps appearing on the edge of the page after it has been trimmed.
I have fixed the issue myself been doing it for decades using xara. What I am pointing out is the problem assosiated with xaras new invention called the auto bleed feature. Surely are we saying let them make new features that do not work and we can have a workaround it?
We have been doing exactly that since the time I can remember. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by behzad