apparently the royal mint cannot count
Re: apparently the royal mint cannot count
Re: apparently the royal mint cannot count
Quote:
Originally Posted by
handrawn
What a screw-up.
I also wonder where Iping is supposed to be.
Re: apparently the royal mint cannot count
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Iping is a village and parish[1] in the Chichester district of West Sussex, England. It lies within the civil parish of Stedham with Iping, just off the A272 road 2 miles (3.2 km) west of Midhurst. The village lies on the River Rother.
Iping is the setting for the classic H. G. Wells science fiction story (1897) The Invisible Man.
Re: apparently the royal mint cannot count
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ss-kalm
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Iping is a village and parish[1] in the Chichester district of West Sussex, England. It lies within the civil parish of Stedham with Iping, just off the A272 road 2 miles (3.2 km) west of Midhurst. The village lies on the River Rother.
Iping is the setting for the classic H. G. Wells science fiction story (1897) The Invisible Man.
Thanks for that - I assumed they meant Epping!
Re: apparently the royal mint cannot count
There's nothing like a monstrous quodpod. What a cock up!
Re: apparently the royal mint cannot count
Who's to say it's a fourth leg? One is not articulated like the other three or emerge from the same body part.
Acorn
Re: apparently the royal mint cannot count
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Acorn
Who's to say it's a fourth leg? One is not articulated like the other three or emerge from the same body part.
Acorn
It's possible it's the arm to capture humans with and they still have the invisible man screw-up..
Re: apparently the royal mint cannot count
Run Away! Run Away! It's a giant penis!!
Re: apparently the royal mint cannot count
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Acorn
Who's to say it's a fourth leg? One is not articulated like the other three or emerge from the same body part.
Acorn
if you download the webp and zoom in you should see they are, it's just that the detail for the one in the foreground has suffered in perspective in the photograph, being in the shadow of the body
Quote:
Originally Posted by pauland
It's possible it's the arm to capture humans with and they still have the invisible man screw-up..
that would be the segmented appendage with the claw on the end that bob [iamtheblues] maybe thinks is..... something else
:D