2G's PUBLISHING is the name that my co-author and I are going to use for our new e-book of stereograms that we are designing for the ipad.
Printable View
2G's PUBLISHING is the name that my co-author and I are going to use for our new e-book of stereograms that we are designing for the ipad.
I like number 1; clever combination! Number 2 reads a bit like a fleur de lis; perhaps french influence is appropriate. Both, well done!
Pro work Gary
Hi Gary.
I prefer the first one.
A slightly thicker font for the number 2 might be worth considering?!
Although I would be surprised if you hadn't.
I also though that the attached might be worth considering?
I tried to give the 'G' more of a 'G' look whilst still being able to see the number '2'.
Well, that's my entry and I'm sticking to it!
No, you won't shift me!
;))
Rik - That is what my partner suggested (a heavier 2) And I have to say, your design looks rather good. :)
I prefer no. 2 by far. Its named two G's, I see two G's. The first one is too complicated for me.
But I guess everybody will see different things looking at the same pictures.
Juergen
I'd leave out the apostrophe if I were you, Gary.
Saludos,
Bob.
Hi Gary.
Fantastic that you liked my effort. Use the design, use the idea and in fact you said that your partner prefers a heavier 2, anyway.
In my opinion, I think it has more effect.
As for the apostrophe that Bob mentions.
If you have something that belongs to someone or something, then you need an apostrophe.
If there is more than one of something, then you don't use the apostrophe.
So, it depends upon what you are trying to say with the company name?!
Or, you could simply call it '2 G Publishing'
:D
Or even 2 Gs Publishing. Given that the topic title is "Two logos for two G's" I'd say that there is no possession intended. "Two G's Two logos" would indicate possession but as it stands, for it to be possessive you would have to ask the question " Two logos for two G's what?", suggesting that the topic title is incomplete in some way. ;)
Saludos,
Bob.
I like the second logo in your original post Gary. :)