I just rec'd an email from Fonts.com with the following link:
http://webfonts.fonts.com/?utm_sourc...ign=Newsletter
Has anyone investigated?
Any opinions?
Printable View
I just rec'd an email from Fonts.com with the following link:
http://webfonts.fonts.com/?utm_sourc...ign=Newsletter
Has anyone investigated?
Any opinions?
The service by Fonts.com is new but the concept has been around for awhile.
Fonts.com provides access to the fonts via a web service. A site using the service must include a script that must be created by accessing fonts.com.
If a person does not have the specified font installed, the font is made available via the service for use within the browser for viewing that web page. The font is not installed on the viewers machine, simply made available for temporary use.
I just had a look at fonts.com, watched the video etc. It looks promising and I'm anxious to try it out. I'm pretty tired of 'web-safe' font restrictions and would be happy to see them go the way of web-safe colours. If this sort of cloud-based font serving catches on I'd expect to see some of the big foundries jumping on the band-wagon. I'd be interested to hear what more you have to say about this, and others too. I mean, imagine, not being restricted to Arial and those other garbage type-faces! It would be great.
Then imagine the horrible font choices some people might make that we would be forced to try and read :-OQuote:
Originally Posted by philt
It's bad enough with some sites frying our retinas or causing instant nausea with the colour and design choices let alone having to deal with someones idea of a cool font.
Never mind only Web Safe, what of 'Eye-Safe' ;)
Which is easier to read here:
Attachment 71958
One corporation I worked for we had to mandate the font to be used for email. Some people's choice of font made them totally illegable.
Absolutely right Sledger. That was my first thought too. Just imagine! A multitude of typographically illiterate morons turned loose to wreak absolute havoc. Yikes.
Guys, same problem with presentation slides I get.
Seriously, though, when there are branding considerations for a client, then having their web site use a font/font family that serves uniformity in their identity and "message", both for electronic and well as print media, is important.
Hi John,
I think we all agree with what you are saying about branding. :)
People being people, we can foresee some sites using fonts that may not be the best choice. ;)>:)
Massimo Vignelli, who knows his stuff, says 'We use way too many fonts', and he's right I think. although many disagree. His video clip here http://bigthink.com/massimovignelli is worth watching--and thinking about.
People who want to use the weirdest fonts already have lots of choices, be it
Cufon - using Javascript to replace text with SVG of your text with font of your choice
sifr - replacing your text with flash representation with your font
the webservice solution already mentioned.
What I personally dislike regarding the web service solution is the same as for example js libs hosted by i.e. Google, MS or others:
1. You don't have control over what is delivered. They can change version and you do not notice. They can put anything else in it and you don't notice. Not even mentioning the fact that these companies can monitor usage of your pages ..
2. You need to be careful about bandwidth. Like a lot of cloud based solution, you usually pay by used bandwidth/volume. If your site gains a lot of attention quick, it may not go down as your own server, but serve quick and make you poor even quicker.
Juergen
Hi Juergen,Quote:
Originally Posted by juergen
There is a notable upside to having the font data managed by the service provider. When the data is enhanced with hinting for better on-screen display, adjusted to compensate for differences in browser rendering techniques, or expanded with additional characters, the customer receives these benefits. (disclosure: I'm a Monotype Imaging/Fonts.com employee)
Most certainly true. There will be scenarios like for example an ad campaign, where you only have the pro's and others like online banking portals, where you just have the con's. And probably a lot of others where you simply have to evaluate.Quote:
Originally Posted by jzsittnik
Guys, same problem with presentation slides I get.Quote:
Originally Posted by philt
Seriously, though, when there are branding considerations for a client, then having their web site use a font/font family that serves uniformity in their identity and "message", both for electronic and well as print media, is important.
__________________
download ipad books
ipad ibooks
I wrote a review recently for Communication Arts Magazine (print version only) for the Adobe version of this via TypeKit Typekit offers web font service for a large number of foundries (type companies). It is OK if you want a site to have a very distinct look typographically, for example a large corporate website. But the service is not cheap and to be honest, I could not get it to work with DP6.
The process is interesting. You subscribe to the service based on the number of sites and number of fonts you wish to use. Add script to your HTML that sends the request and replaces the fonts in the browser with the specified fonts. Typekit claims that their high speed servers replace the text so quickly that no one will notice.
If the purpose of a website is to provide information and/or content, then the best font to use is the one that is the easiest to read, and preferably, one that has been designed fontmetrically speaking, for the web.
I would have to take issue with their claim that their servers change the type so fast that no one will notice.
I brought up many of the example websites in the example gallery.
They were all very slow to render, first in my browsers fonts, then with a noticeable ker-chunk, shifted over to the hosted web fonts.
I think it is a good idea, but from what I have seen I don't think it is ready for prime time just yet.
- Andy