Stereogram - Remind you of anyone?

?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereogram

It's George!

By George it is.

and very nicely done, for an autumnal George

George who?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Boy

George who?

---

I'm glad someone asked. I have no idea, either.

a forum member maybe....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by handrawn

a forum member maybe....

---

LOL, Doh!

I always through I was a little thinner round the waist. :-O

Acorn

:)

Oh, that George! Good looking guy.

:)

I can see the object clearly, just not sure what I'm seeing. Looks like an acorn, named George???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Acorn

I always through I was a little thinner round the waist. :-O

Acorn

---

Yes, eye see! http://magiceye.ecksdee.co.uk/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gray

I can see the object clearly, just not sure what I'm seeing. Looks like an acorn, named George???

---

gray, my TG handle is Acorn, my calling name is George.

Acorn

Thank you, now that makes sense.

TwoEdgedSword - I have never seen that little utility. It does a pretty OK job determining the mass of the hidden object. But if the algorithm was cross eyes (Convergent) as the text reads, then the stereogram would appear to be going in and not out.

All of the stereograms I create are intended for parallel viewing (eyes parallel instead of crossed). But someone who views stereograms with cross eyes will see this version correctly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gwpriester

TwoEdgedSword - I have never seen that little utility. It does a pretty OK job determining the mass of the hidden object. But if the algorithm was cross eyes (Convergent) as the text reads, then the stereogram would appear to be going in and not out.

---

Your latest stereogram does not render, so perhaps there is an error in the write-up.

I can see where it says cross eyes, but I fail to see the dotted teas.

Quote:

---

Your latest stereogram does not render, so perhaps there is an error in the write-up.

I can see where it says cross eyes, but I fail to see the dotted teas.

---

Can you see the actual image I posted?

Attached is the depth image. The software I use uses the depth image to determine the shape of the hidden image.

Both version work for me, although I personally found the second one (the one coming out) much easier to get started.

Quote:

---

Both version work for me, although I personally found the second one (the one coming out) much easier to get started.

---

Ah, then you are viewing crossed eye. If you view parallel, both eyes looking straight ahead and focusing just beyond the image, the first version comes forward. The second version will appear like the inside of a mold. I do not like cross eyes viewing, I feel like my eyes are straining, but when I do, I get much greater depth.

I get both versions straight away, but prefer the first The second one is a bit spooky!

I find both versions easy to see, but also prefer the first for viewing.