Re: Congratulations TalkGraphics.com...
The lowest existing user is #2: http://www.talkgraphics.com/member.php?u=2
Funny thing is, he's registered 04 March 2004. :D
So, I think the free numbers can be reused with new accounts. :)
Re: Congratulations TalkGraphics.com...
1889 here - registered 3rd Jan 2001.
Christine
Re: Congratulations TalkGraphics.com...
#581 and registered 26 November 2000. I was a lurker before that :D
My first post: http://www.talkgraphics.com/showthread.php?t=3891
Re: Congratulations TalkGraphics.com...
thats really cool, I'm 2901, I never noticed that before, learn something new every day.
Re: Congratulations TalkGraphics.com...
The only way that I can get my ID number anywhere near that low is to convert it to hexadecimal ... 4320 (17184 decimal) :D
Re: Congratulations TalkGraphics.com...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Ross Macintosh
My number is 168. :eek:
Gary's is number 83 :cool:
Anybody have an even earlier one?
Mine is 81... However I think Gary had some problem with his inscription at this time because logically he should be "1" !
ivan
Re: Congratulations TalkGraphics.com...
I'm 268 (and sometimes feel that old!), registered in August 2000 — and what a great group to belong to.
Mickie
Re: Congratulations TalkGraphics.com...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cursor
The only way that I can get my ID number anywhere near that low is to convert it to hexadecimal ... 4320 (17184 decimal) :D
Curtis, you just have to think outside the conventional and use a base 17184 numbering system. See, now you're number 1. ;)
No problem at all,
Harry
Re: Congratulations TalkGraphics.com...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HayTay
Curtis, you just have to think outside the conventional and use a base 17184 numbering system. See, now you're number 1. ;)
No problem at all,
Harry
Wouldn't that make him 10 in base 17184, not 1 ?
Kinda reminds me of the old saying "There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't."
Re: Congratulations TalkGraphics.com...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ckh
Wouldn't that make him 10 in base 17184, not 1
Hmmm, you're probably right, Chris. In my defense, I'm not used to base 17184 numbering systems and more than a 'bit' fuzzy on doing the calculations in my head. Yeah, right. :D That's my story, though, and, like hair in a biscuit, I'm sticking to it. ;)