DOCTYPEs, Web Standards, etc...
How many of you are trying to keep your sites standards compliant?
Do you?
1. For DOCTYPE, use Strict, Loose, or Transitional, or nothing?
http://www.alistapart.com/stories/doctype/
2. Use XHTML1.1, XHTML1.0, HTML4, don't know/don't care?
I've settled on XHTML1.1 strict, which requires strict adherence to the rules (all lower case tags, self closing tags must have />, for example: <br/>, <img src="go.gif" />, etc).
As someone with programming experience, the enforcement of the rules is not a problem as compilers are generally not very forgiving, depending on the programing language...
As a follow up, have you looked at emerging standards like CSS3, HTML 5, and XHTML 2?
Both HTML 5 and XHTML 2 have interesting new features, but are years away from finalization, and implementation by browsers.
Re: DOCTYPEs, Web Standards, etc...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
StevenWWinters
How many of you are trying to keep your sites standards compliant?
Do you?
Yup
Tho I'd refer to www.w3schools.com for the doctypes.
I usually use XHTML 1.0 Transitional, I tried with strict, but I'm not always in the mood to argue with the rules about how it should be.
Tho I do use all that closing and lower case tags, I also use css as much as possible.
I haven't looked much at HTML5/XHTML2, but I run into "coming in CSS3" all the time...
As a comment, I don't like the way some browsers tend to accept invalid tags, and why do they still have the old flash tags on youtube? (embed)
Re: DOCTYPEs, Web Standards, etc...
Nearly all the work that I do at the moment I use XHTML1.1 strict but I am fed up tidying up the code from GoLive no one they dropped quickly when they bought Marcromedia and went on and developed DW.