Welcome to TalkGraphics.com
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Tarzana, Ca.
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Does any one know how Webster 2 compares with Xara X? The discription on xara.com seems to be lacking...
    Thanks to you many much,

    Byronious

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Tarzana, Ca.
    Posts
    47

    Default

    Does any one know how Webster 2 compares with Xara X? The discription on xara.com seems to be lacking...
    Thanks to you many much,

    Byronious

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Out behind the henweigh...
    Posts
    5,115

    Default

    I call webster, xara X1's retarded little brother. It has all the tools of xara, but not the inputs and outputs. It does try to define the .xar and .web files types as webster files, so I do not have it installed.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,716

    Default

    Rather than its retarted brother, think of it as Xara X Lite. http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/smile.gif

    However you really don't want to install it if you have Xara X installed. It messes things up quite a bit.
    I'd start a revolution, if I could get up in the morning.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Out behind the henweigh...
    Posts
    5,115

    Default

    hi AntonyF,

    I have to agree, commercially, a lite version is a better way of saying it. But... it is so much more humourous to think of webster as "Rudpert the monkey boy", as portrayed by Steve Martin in "Dirty Rotten Scoundels". http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/wink.gif http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •