Does any one know how Webster 2 compares with Xara X? The discription on xara.com seems to be lacking...
Does any one know how Webster 2 compares with Xara X? The discription on xara.com seems to be lacking...
Thanks to you many much,
Byronious
Does any one know how Webster 2 compares with Xara X? The discription on xara.com seems to be lacking...
Thanks to you many much,
Byronious
I call webster, xara X1's retarded little brother. It has all the tools of xara, but not the inputs and outputs. It does try to define the .xar and .web files types as webster files, so I do not have it installed.
Rather than its retarted brother, think of it as Xara X Lite. http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/smile.gif
However you really don't want to install it if you have Xara X installed. It messes things up quite a bit.
I'd start a revolution, if I could get up in the morning.
hi AntonyF,
I have to agree, commercially, a lite version is a better way of saying it. But... it is so much more humourous to think of webster as "Rudpert the monkey boy", as portrayed by Steve Martin in "Dirty Rotten Scoundels". http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/wink.gif http://www.talkgraphics.com/images/smilies/biggrin.gif
Bookmarks