Re: Need Seamless transfer to Corel
Vectors transfer nicely to CorelDRAW, to export from Xara to CorelDRAW 32-Bit Presentation Exchange (6).
As you will note, there are things which work one way but not really well the other. You can for most things in CorelDRAW copy and paste into Xara an it pastes well as the above format, CorelDRAW 32-Bit Presentation Exchange (6).
Embedding a Xara document does not yield a good enough dpi to make it worth the effort. Making .pdf from Xara itself is not importable into either DRAW 12 or X3, but if you print to Adobe Acrobat Professional it is importable. If you change an graphic which has elements which are not importable into DRAW via .pdf, and you have a mixture of vectors and bitmaps, it doesn't work well, if you have to move items around, your bitmaps have been impossibly sliced and diced. Even if you saved them as .png in Xara at 300 dpi, it will come in via the print as Acrobat .pdf at 200 dpi and this isn't very nice and it takes forever to process. You can in advanced settings tell it 300 dpi and it slices and dices the picture up as though it is handling the picture like a .eps file. Even to ungroup or leave grouped in DRAW and change to a 300 dpi CMYK is not good, you see ten gillion seam lines. Best is to use a .tif for bitmaps as 24 bit RGB color and let the color management in PhotoPaint convert it to CMYK, prints much better. That way color management is only being applied once, not twice. Saving as a .tif is also much quicker and you import much faster. Whenever you don't have to compress your .tifs, don't. To transfer from one program to another, don't compress.
Items which are not going to be recognized by DRAW are: fractals, any type, tranparent or fractal fills, any type of transparency is iffy at best. And if you use drop shadows, I'd use .tif or .png for that too, it is more sure. If you bring in a .png from Xara and use DRAW or PhotoPaint the .png vs. the .tif when converted looks washed out.
I encourage you to try this experiment for yourself and see with your own eyes.
So if you do not have to do any future editing you could bring it all in as a .tif 24 bit RGB and then convert to CMYK, I like doing that in PhotoPaint, get better color overall this way. What works best is what I use, that way I have no regrets and no reruns because I got a bit lazy. DRAW is a vector program that does bitmaps on the side, whereas PhotoPaint specializes in bitmaps. Use what is designed to give you the best effect. It is fast, just right click and picke edit bitmap, bada boom, your in PhotoPaint. Change to CMYK, accept the normal profile and save and DRAW is updated. Very fast.
If you need to edit in the future vectors and bitmaps, then you have to repiece it together in DRAW, either using the .cmx 6 exchange format or printing to .pdf. Believe me Acrobat Professional does its job here. And whereas I love Xara dearly, their .pdf's just don't work to import them into DRAW 12 or X3, sorry, that's the truth. I did have better luck before Xara Xtreme Pro but have since taken other versions of Xara out of my machine because I only use Xara Xtreme Pro now. And sorry for test comparisons, I do want to get to bed before midnight.
When I write advice, I test everything I am telling you again as I am writing to be sure I am telling what works and what doesn't.
The reason why you use .cmx 6 32-bit vs. cmx.5 16-bit is that you have more accurate color information, twice the color information. Use what works best.
As a rule of thumb, if it is understood in Flash, it is often understood in DRAW, except that DRAW does understand Xara italic lines and Flash doesn't, have to convert to shapes, which isn't a bad idea anyway.
Last edited by sallybode; 20 February 2007 at 05:02 AM.
Every day's a new day, "draw" on what you've learned.
Sally M. Bode
Bookmarks