I was foolishly trying to see if I could recreate the Escher-esque triangle optical illusion as a stereogram. Of course this was a futile exercise since the illusion is really a 2D image and is impossible to create as a 3D object.
But in the process I came up with the attached stereogram which has some elements of an optical illusion.
15 June 2010, 12:14 PM
zee
Re: Triangluation - A stereogram
Amazing! Thanks for sharing this.
15 June 2010, 12:34 PM
-=Drifter=-
Re: Triangluation - A stereogram
Extremely cool! Another excellent creation, Gary!
15 June 2010, 12:41 PM
Soquili
Re: Triangluation - A stereogram
Amazing stereogram Gary.
The triangle pops out instantly, but when looking for details the illusion jumps into view and my mind says that is impossible. ;))
A real mind twister. :D
15 June 2010, 02:10 PM
Deltapete
Re: Triangluation - A stereogram
Great but mind bending image Gary.:eek:
Thanks for sharing,
Peter
15 June 2010, 03:42 PM
gray
Re: Triangluation - A stereogram
That produced a real interesting effect, Gary.
15 June 2010, 04:33 PM
ss-kalm
Re: Triangluation - A stereogram
Excellent Gary. Works better than anything else I've ever seen.
15 June 2010, 04:50 PM
gwpriester
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Triangluation - A stereogram
Here's the depth image. It is a blend of two shapes. Basically the result was a happy accident.
15 June 2010, 09:16 PM
steve.ledger
Re: Triangluation - A stereogram
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwpriester
the illusion is really a 2D image and is impossible to create as a 3D object.
Only without imagination ;)
(which in Perth, Western Australia, someone has)
15 June 2010, 09:25 PM
gwpriester
Re: Triangulation - A stereogram
You just couldn't resist, could you? :-O
15 June 2010, 09:41 PM
handrawn
Re: Triangulation - A stereogram
that sort of twisting of perspective by perception in the real world is well known Steve - stage illusionists use it for a start
but as its not a solid unbroken object, Gary is right IMO - oh and a master of stereograms - nice one Gary :-bd
15 June 2010, 09:48 PM
steve.ledger
Re: Triangulation - A stereogram
Oh really? Gee thanks for the heads up :D:p
Back on topic, I couldn't get this one because I can only see cross-eyed wise :(
15 June 2010, 09:52 PM
angelize
Re: Triangulation - A stereogram
I think the stereogram is great! I agree with handrawn that because it's not a solid unbroken object that it doesn't count. But it was a great illusion!
15 June 2010, 10:01 PM
steve.ledger
Re: Triangulation - A stereogram
Illusion is the whole point. I think Escher understood this and I'm pretty well convinced by now that so does Gary. :D
15 June 2010, 10:12 PM
angelize
Re: Triangulation - A stereogram
I started being able to see stereograms without going cross eyed because of a reflection on my screen. Try to postion your screen if possible so that there is a reflection perhaps from a nearby window. Then try to focus on the reflection while also looking at the stereogram. Once you have been able to see them once or twice it will become easier to see them.
15 June 2010, 10:35 PM
steve.ledger
Re: Triangulation - A stereogram
I have non-reflective (by choice) S-IPS panels.
I'm happy to at least see the cross-eye way, else I'd be missing out on Gary's fine efforts - he's quite good at it :)
15 June 2010, 10:37 PM
gwpriester
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Triangulation - A stereogram
Here's a cross eyed version so Steve L can see it too. (:|
15 June 2010, 10:44 PM
steve.ledger
Re: Triangulation - A stereogram
:nerd::thanks
16 June 2010, 03:41 AM
HayTay
Re: Triangulation - A stereogram
You continue to impress me Gary. That is one nice looking 'mistake'.
16 June 2010, 09:51 AM
Jimi King
Re: Triangulation - A stereogram
I can see both versions. However in the first one the triangle seems kind of inverted and in the second one the triangle seems to be a background object viewed through a hole in the foreground. I guess this makes me weird.
16 June 2010, 10:40 AM
ankhor
Re: Triangulation - A stereogram
Yes jimi, because I can only see them exactly opposite as you see them. ;)
I can see the cross eyed one right and the straight one as a hole.
I actually like the depth of the hole more then the triangle. It has far more depth. So in that way I am weird ;)
And thanx gary for posting the crosseyed one too.
I am so glad I can finally see those blasted things.